Excellence through expert review
The NYC Podcast Awards runs a rigorous, three-round judging process built to find and celebrate the very best in audio storytelling. Our panel of academics, industry professionals, and cultural influencers brings diverse perspectives from across the medium, and after a full first season of LIBBYs, they know exactly what excellence sounds like. Every submission gets a fair, comprehensive listen.
Screening
All entries are reviewed for eligibility and distributed to category-specific judging panels based on expertise. Screening committee anonymity is maintained during this round to protect the integrity of the process.
Evaluation
Multiple judges score each entry using detailed rubrics covering technical excellence, creativity, impact, and category standards. Where possible, evaluation is blind to creator identity.
Deliberation
Top entries advance to the final round, where judges discuss nuances and select winners through collaborative review. Winners are revealed at the ceremony on March 12, 2027.
Audience Choice
Every category also has an Audience Choice winner, decided completely by the public. When nominees are announced, voting opens to everyone. No judges, no rubrics, just listeners picking the work they love.
Four lenses on every entry
Technical Excellence
Production quality, sound design, editing, and technical execution that enhances the listening experience.
Creativity
Originality of concept, unique storytelling approach, and innovative use of the audio medium.
Impact
Ability to connect with audiences, emotional resonance, and effectiveness in achieving the work's purpose.
Category Standards
Achievement of excellence specific to hosting, acting, writing, or genre-specific storytelling.
Our Judging Academy
Judges are selected by invitation only, ensuring our panel represents the highest level of expertise and commitment to excellence. We curate diverse perspectives across academia, industry professionals, and cultural influencers who champion underrepresented voices in audio storytelling.
Conflict of Interest
Judges recuse themselves from evaluating any submission where they have personal or professional connections to the creators.
Blind Evaluation
Where possible, judges evaluate submissions without knowledge of creator identity to minimize bias.
Multiple Reviewers
Each entry is reviewed by multiple judges to ensure consistent and fair evaluation. Individual judges are highlighted publicly during round three.
Nominate a judge
Positions are by invitation, but nominations from the community are welcome. Know someone with the ears and the credentials? Tell us. Self-nominations are absolutely allowed.